Lakoff opens her essay with pathos. She will read it and be insulted by the stereotype that she is fragile and in need of saving or 2.
Professor of linguistics emerita, University of California, Berkeley Education: Education is invaluable not only in its ability to help people and societies get ahead, but equally in helping them develop the perspectives that make them fully human. We can only "win the future," he told us, "if we improve our educational system and make it function better for its consumers.
Absolutely right on, I thought. But then I noticed something about the president's repeated references to "education" and what the term seemed to mean to him.
Without exception, when he specified what "education" was about, it was the new trinity: If education imparted these forms of knowledge to students, we were assured, this country's tradition of innovation would return and save us -- economically and even socially.
That, it seemed, was what education was and what it was for: I applaud those motives and I agree that excellence in those areas is a crucial aspect of education and a strong justification for it.
But is that the only reason to get an education -- or even the major one? As a social scientist-cum-humanist, rather than a mathematician, physical scientist or technocrat, I have to argue with the president's implicit definitions. To define the goals of education so narrowly is to restrict its value and, I would say, to sell ourselves short as individuals, as a society and as a nation.
Education, properly conceived and developed, can and should do much more. The discourse of Sarah Palin and her friends is appalling on its own, but worse is the way in which their readings of the Constitution and American history in general have been accepted as uncontroversially true by so many voters.
There is a reason why this nation's founders, especially Thomas Jefferson, were concerned with making education available to all prospective voters and the Tea Party's success demonstrates the validity of their concern.
There is a reason why Abraham Lincoln signed the law establishing land-grant colleges in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War. Voters who have been exposed to critical thinking, especially in the areas of the social sciences, including of course political science, history and civics, are better voters than ignoramuses: So even if we persist in valuing education only in terms of its practical value, that value must go beyond the holy three sanctified by President Obama.
To be economically competitive, Americans must be conversant with science and technology which imply mathematics. But in order to be politically intelligent and make important decisions at the ballot box, we must be equally familiar with history and politics.
But as important as it is to recognize the practical values of education, to me it seems even more important to recognize its less practical but equally vital functions. Education exposes us to ourselves and one another, to people seemingly very unlike ourselves but not so different after all, if we get to know themas well as to our own habits of thought.Robin Lakoff's “You Are What You Say”: Critique In her article “You Are What You Say,” Robin Lakoff () uses several examples to argue that there is no such thing as "women's language"; it is the way people interpret it.
She argues that whenever a word is used by women or used to describe women, it becomes derogatory. Gender and tags. Yesterday I promised Second, even systematic observation can be misleading, if you don't make the right observational distinctions or don't control for the context in an appropriate way.
work Language and Women's Place, Robin Lakoff depicted a typical female speech style, allegedly characterized by the use of features. I've tried searching for the origins of this question, and I believe it comes from "what say you", which means to ask what decision/recommendation have you arrived at.
If I were to take that meaning, I would assume to respond with some sort of remark on the current location or other obvious circumstance, such as "this is a nice location".
May 17, · Lakoff, Language, and Women's Place While searching for bibliographic information (or at least a publication date) for the Robin Lakoff reading, "You Are What You Say," I came across this blog post by an individual who claims to know Lakoff. The publication of Robin Tolmach Lakoff's Language and Woman's Place, is widely recognized as having inaugurated feminist research on the relationship between language and gender, touching off a remarkable response among language scholars, feminists, and general ashio-midori.com the past thirty years, scholars of language and gender have been debating and developing Lakoff's initial observations.
You are what you say The essay, " you are what you say " is written by Robin Lakoff, a Professor of Linguistics at University of California. She has explicated her view on how English language has functioned to revile and debase women, why women are thought to .